🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios launched a fresh playlist called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but features a few notable changes:

• Every squad includes just eight real players, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Actions performed by real players grant complete experience points, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, achievements, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, this mode delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for gamers seeking different ways to enjoy the game. However, if video games has shown one thing, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," reads one reply to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments a different user. At the same time, in community forums, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are going with this title," while someone else details all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, real players prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community doesn't understand that there are players who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Let them strike a balance," adds a different comment. A response via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," while another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Feedback

Despite the support, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for different playlists due to the large amount of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that got canned when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the player base compromising halfway, as per forum feedback. Another describes this mode as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and responding to feedback. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this new playlist is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.