🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like it requires a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.