🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include up to five additional GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the districts established after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action comes amid a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have countered with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A leading House leader said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by upholding a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.